Join
|
Join FreePint and receive the Newsletter every two weeks for free.
Join Now >>
| |
If you find FreePint useful, please supply a testimonial
Recommended
|
Other sites of interest to Jinfo users:
 Jinfo -
recruit for information-related roles, or find your next challenge. »
 VIP - monthly magazine reviewing business information products »
 FUMSI - articles, tools, and a monthly magazine, to
give you practical help with information skills »
 ResourceShelf - daily update of web-based resources »
 DocuTicker - daily update of free, full-text reports »
|
|
|
|
Home > Forum > Bar > Message |
|
|
Join FreePint and receive the twice-weekly Bar Digest and twice-monthly tip-packed Newsletter. It's free. [ more ]
|
|
|
|
 The FreePint Bar is generously sponsored by Dow Jones Factiva.
|
|
|
| Start New | Message Index  | Flat View |
| FOI marking documents with potentially exempt ma |
| Author: | Kevin Miles |
| Date: | Wednesday, 19th Jan 2005 10:44 |
| Views: | 1,874 (excluding Digests and RSS feeds) |
| Category: | Information Issues | | URL: | http://www.freepint.com/go/b31147 |
|
TRL has been contacted by some public authorities inviting us to identify information where we would wish to restrict FOI disclosure unless an overriding public interest exists. I have also asked these same public authorities how they wish to be informed of sensitive information within the documents and emails we exchange during the course of our business, i.e. how they would like documents to be marked. To date no-one has been able to offer any thoughts.
The reason for this seemingly innocuous request is three-fold:
1. I would like to develop a single marking method to give our staff a fair chance of correctly and consistently marking our documents
2. I need public authority staff to have an easy and recognisable way of identifying information TRL considers sensitive to ensure their staff can spot sensitive material within large documents and consider appropriate exemptions
3. If each public authority and each of their contractors, suppliers, etc adopt differing standards / methods, staff in each public authority will be faced with a bewildering range of forms, appendices, hand-marked documents, etc. In these circumstances I frankly doubt the strength of document scrutiny to ensure our thoughts are taken into account.
Ive had a number of thoughts to resolve the dilemma:-
1. Add an appendix listing potentially exempt material.
2. Mark relevant paragraphs in letters, emails and documents with a side-bar using Border functions in word processors
3. Insert a text box with suitable warnings before each paragraph containing potentially exempt material
4. Use page footnotes to identify potentially exempt material
However, each of these approaches has its problems, either physically making it easy for public authority staff to spot potentially exempt material or technically inserting the mark, especially when emails are involved.
As there does not seem to be any formal advice coming from central sources it may be best for our profession to drive the standards before a plethora of approaches are developed.
Any ideas out there?
Kevin Miles
Head of Knowledge Management
TRL Ltd
|
|
| Start New | |
| Topic |
Author |
Date |
ID |
| FOI marking documents with potentially exempt ma | | TRL has been contacted by some public authorities inviting us to identify information where we would wish to restrict FOI ... |
|
Kevin Miles |
19/01/05 10:44 |
31147 |
|
Alison Ross-Dow |
20/01/05 10:58 |
31156 |
|
Nick Tjaardstra |
26/01/05 12:59 |
31205 |
|
Kevin Miles |
20/01/05 13:47 |
31158 |
|
Sara Somerville |
24/01/05 11:47 |
31183 |
|
Olivia Freeman |
10/02/05 15:38 |
31353 |
Please note: The reply form is not showing because the posting is older than six months or the thread is locked. Please start a new topic or contact the forum administrator.
|
|